We use cookies to make your experience better. To comply with the new e-Privacy directive, we need to ask for your consent to set the cookies.
A junior engineer noticed the Mass Summary by Story showed only 1,200 kips of mass at the ground floor, while the architectural takeoff showed 1,800 kips.
In this article, we will move beyond the default settings. We will explore how to extract, validate, and optimize the ETABS Mass Summary by Story to ensure your dynamic analysis (Response Spectrum, Time History) and modal results are physically accurate. The default ETABS Mass Summary is only as good as your assumptions. Many engineers open the table, see a number, and immediately proceed to design. This is a mistake. etabs mass summary by story better
| Story | U1 (X) ton | U2 (Y) ton | U3 (Z) ton | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Roof | 150 | 150 | 1000 | | 3rd Fl | 250 | 250 | 1200 | | 2nd Fl | 250 | 250 | 1200 | | Base | 200 | 200 | 1500 | A junior engineer noticed the Mass Summary by
If you have ever run a seismic analysis in ETABS, you have undoubtedly stared at the Mass Summary by Story table. It appears deceptively simple: a list of stories, masses in X, Y, Z, and a summation. Yet, for many engineers, this table is a source of quiet anxiety. The default ETABS Mass Summary is only as